We've built companies, fired people, pivoted products, survived missed payrolls, and rung closing bells. We know what you're going through — not because we read about it, but because we lived it.
Meridian invests at Seed and Series A in deep tech, climate infrastructure, and AI companies. We write first checks of $1M–$12M, reserve 2.5x for follow-on, and stay on your board through IPO or acquisition.
Most VCs pick a portfolio and hope. We spend the first 90 days after every investment embedded with your team — understanding your go-to-market, your hiring gaps, your first-year risks. We've been operationally useful to every company we've backed.
Our LPs include sovereign wealth funds, family offices, and three former unicorn founders who trust us to find the next generation of defining companies. That network is available to every founder in our portfolio.
"The question every founder should ask a VC is not 'How much can you write?' It's 'Who answers the phone at midnight when the board is fracturing?' At Meridian, every founder has that number."
We've backed 61 companies since 2012. Below is a cross-section — not cherry-picked winners, but a representative picture of the categories where we invest. 12 of these companies have achieved unicorn status. 9 have exited.
Our thesis isn't a list of buzzwords — it's a specific view on where technological capability, cost curves, regulatory tailwinds, and talent convergence are pointing. We've held this view publicly since 2019. Our returns suggest we were right.
Manufacturing, logistics, energy, and agriculture are 80% of global GDP but received less than 8% of venture investment over the past decade. The companies building software-native infrastructure for these sectors will generate the largest returns of the 2020s.
$150 trillion in energy infrastructure will be replaced over 30 years. We invest at the stack layer just above hardware — software, services, and marketplace platforms that make clean infrastructure economically obligatory, not aspirational.
Foundation models will be cheap in 24 months. The durable businesses are the deployment layer — integration, compliance, orchestration, and workflow AI for industries where generic models can't ship. That's where we focus.
Our four general partners have collectively founded 7 companies, taken 3 public, and led or participated in $4.2B in exits before ever managing a fund. They know what good and bad boards look like from both sides of the table.
Founding team matters most. We've passed on objectively excellent markets because the team didn't have the capability to win them. We've invested in thin markets because the team could expand them.
Technical moat required. We don't invest in distribution-first businesses at seed. We need to see IP, proprietary data, or a technical wedge that creates durable defensibility.
We don't do spray-and-pray. We have 8–10 new investments per year across the fund. Every founder gets a GP on their board, real operational attention, and access to the full network.
Honest on what we won't fund: consumer social, crypto speculation, ad-tech, or anything with negative social externalities we can't reconcile.
These are unedited quotes pulled from our annual founder NPS survey (82% response rate, 2024). We publish the full results — good and bad — in our annual transparency report.
Daniel didn't just make intros — he got on calls with our top 5 target customers, gave us intel on exactly how to position, and then stepped back. Three of those became our biggest accounts. That's not VC behavior. That's co-founder behavior.
We burned through cash faster than projected in year two. Most investors would have called an emergency board meeting and started discussing pivot or shutdown. Meridian showed up with a bridge term sheet before I even asked. That's the difference between a partner and a monitor.
Elena's technical credibility opened doors I couldn't have opened in five years on my own. When she's in the room, enterprise buyers treat us like a peer, not a startup. She has access to scientific advisory boards, national labs, and government procurement teams. Completely undervalued by the term sheet alone.
I've taken three rounds across two companies. Meridian's term sheet is structurally different — no participating preferred, no 2x liquidation preference, no ratchets. On paper it costs them on downside outcomes. That's the whole point. They're betting on a win, not hedging against a loss at your expense.
We've been on the other side of a VC process. We know it's dehumanizing when done poorly. Our process has hard timelines we stick to — and we give honest feedback even when we pass.
We back companies that others think are too early, too technical, or too hard to explain in an elevator. Those are usually the best ones. If yours fits that description, we are very interested.
Not sure if you fit? Submit anyway. We've invested in companies that didn't match our thesis on paper but whose teams changed our minds in conversation. The worst outcome is a fast, honest "no" with useful feedback.
Takes 8 minutes. A GP reviews every submission within 5 business days.
We respond to every submission. Passing does not mean we share your information with third parties. Your deck stays with us.